R-LABSHealthcare + Housing Innovation Cluster
Participate
← All missions

Mission 5 · Regenerative Living Solution

Healthy Communities from the Ground Up

Stage: Exploring

Plan communities where housing, healthcare access, active mobility, accessibility, and community infrastructure are designed together from the beginning.

Join This MissionExplore the First Proof of Value
Healthy Communities from the Ground Up illustrative image

The challenge

Health infrastructure is often added to new communities years after residents arrive.

Who experiences it

Residents of fast-growing communities.

Why current systems fall short

Health facility planning and land-use planning follow different cycles.

Why it crosses sectors

Municipal, developer, and health partners must align on timing and space.

If it stays unresolved

Car-dependent communities with long waits for primary care.

The opportunity

Plan health access and active design into new communities from day one.

What is already known

Built-environment design affects health outcomes.

Demonstrated elsewhere

Healthy community frameworks exist in several jurisdictions.

What R-LABS proposes to test

Apply an integrated framework to a live community plan.

What still requires validation

Planning adoption and delivery mechanisms (To be validated).

The coalition

Who needs to be at the table

Roles are proposed. No organization is implied to have agreed to participate. Select “This could be us” on any role to carry it into the participation form.

Municipalities and public agencies

Proposed role
Why it matters
Municipalities shape land use, approvals, housing programs, and community services.
Could contribute
Planning data, policy alignment, potential land or program levers, and approval navigation.
Could gain
Evidence for planning decisions and a coordinated route to housing and health targets.
Next practical step
Identify a planning or housing lead to review the mission brief.

Developers, builders, and architects

Proposed role
Why it matters
Physical delivery needs design, construction, and cost discipline from the start.
Could contribute
Site analysis, design concepts, cost estimates, and delivery methods.
Could gain
Early positioning on mission-aligned projects with clearer demand and partners.
Next practical step
Propose a candidate site or delivery approach for preliminary review.

Healthcare systems

Proposed role
Why it matters
Health systems see the downstream cost of unstable housing and fragmented care first.
Could contribute
Clinical leadership, a defined patient cohort definition, operational insight, and a pilot host setting.
Could gain
A tested pathway that may improve patient flow and outcomes, with shared evaluation.
Next practical step
Nominate a sponsor to join a 60-minute problem-definition session.

Researchers and evaluators

Proposed role
Why it matters
Independent evaluation separates what works from what simply sounds good.
Could contribute
Evaluation design, baseline methods, literature review, and outcome measurement.
Could gain
Applied research partnerships and access to real-world implementation settings.
Next practical step
Propose an evaluation approach or relevant prior work.

Community organizations

Proposed role
Why it matters
Community organizations hold trust, local knowledge, and service delivery capacity.
Could contribute
Wraparound services, outreach, local insight, and community engagement.
Could gain
A recognised role and resourcing within a coordinated model.
Next practical step
Share the services and populations you currently support.

Select one or more roles above

Continue to participation →

First proof of value

A health-integrated planning framework applied to one community plan.

Proposed plan, not a guaranteed schedule
  1. 1

    Define the problem and target population

  2. 2

    Identify the host organization and local context

  3. 3

    Assemble the minimum viable coalition

  4. 4

    Establish a baseline and evidence plan

  5. 5

    Design and cost a bounded pilot

  6. 6

    Agree on a go / no-go decision

Proposed scope
One community plan.
Required participants
  • Host organization
  • Lead sponsor
  • Evaluation partner
  • R-LABS Solution Accelerator
Key assumptions
  • A host is willing to share non-confidential context
  • A bounded use case can be defined
  • Baseline data is accessible through approved channels
Data or evidence needed
  • Current-state baseline
  • Comparable models elsewhere
  • Stakeholder interviews
Deliverables
  • Problem definition
  • Coalition charter
  • Costed pilot design
  • Evaluation plan
Indicative timeframe
Proposed: 90 days of discovery and design
Success measures
  • Agreed problem statement
  • Committed minimum viable coalition
  • Costed and fundable pilot design
Decision gate
Coalition decides go / no-go on a bounded pilot.

Economics explorer

Test the assumptions

Every input is an editable, illustrative assumption, not verified project data. Replace with local information as it becomes available.
Illustrative assumptions only
Capital
Annual operations

Total capital cost

$20,000,000

Capital funding gap

$10,000,000

Annual operating + support cost

$750,000

Annual operating revenue and contributions

$285,000

Annual operating funding gap

$465,000

Totals are simple calculations on your inputs. They are not project costs, ROI, or funding commitments.

Moonshot

Health as core infrastructure

New communities planned with health access treated like water, roads, and transit.

Target requires coalition agreement.

Participation pathways

Choose a concrete next step

Host a pilot→Provide a potential site or asset→Join as a healthcare partner→Contribute data or research→Develop or operate housing→Contribute technology or expertise→Explore funding or investment→Explore replication or IP permissions→Discuss another contribution→
Join This MissionDiscuss a Pilot